Abstract-writing guidelines Essay Example for Free

Abstract-theme guidelines EssayAn plagiarise allows the author to communicate to his audience the critical information of his original research in a concise manner. Foote (2006) and December and Katz (nd) recommend that in writing a good gyp, it should contain four elements background or objectives, methods, results and conclusion. The background highlights the research questions and/or hypotheses, the methods see the study population, data gathering techniques and statistical analysis. The results indicate the most pertinent findings and should contain actual data (Maughan 2001) and illustrative examples. The conclusion summarizes the findings and implications of the study (Rooryck van Heuven 2003). The abstract should be mingled with 100 and 250 words (Foote 2006, Shan nary(prenominal) 2000, Guidelines for writing an abstract n. d. ) and should never be longer than a page (Rooryck van Heuven 2003). Staiger (1965) suggests that a good abstract can have as little as 150 wo rds once the information is concisely presented. Shannon (2000) and December and Katz (n. d. ) advise that nonessential information much(prenominal) as literature reviews should be avoided.In terms of style only common abbreviations should be employ and only minimally (Foote 2006, Shannon 2000) and jargons should not be used (Maughan 2001). The future tense, adverbs and adjectives should also be avoided. The text should flow and be intelligible and easily comprehended by non-specialists and international readers. Abstract The traditional pattern of duologue and placing of insurance risk between brokers and underwriters follows a face-to-face and paper approach but the new electronic placing system (EPS) is available to allow for submitting, transmitting and negotiating risks and impact claims electronically.This study explores the reasons for introducing, causes for the slow adoption and resistance to the implementation of the EPS systems. In a longitudinal research between 1993 and 1996, we surveyed 94 senior Market management, IT directors and staff, brokers and underwriters in the capital of the United Kingdom Insurance Market using semi-structured interviews, observations of insurance risk placement work practices along with resource reviews. Reasons for introducing, delaying or resisting EPS introduction were copied verbatim and categorized based on its impact on work transformation or pro identity in the workplace.EPS was implemented because of the benefits of productivity, efficiency, speed and cost, its capability to facilitate simultaneous risk transmissions and potential drop to broaden job horizons. Reasons for resisting or delaying introduction of EPS were the resulting minimization of client, broker and underwriter interaction, the EPS inability to transmit supporting customer documents to potential underwriters and its potential to undermine the professional role and identity of brokers and underwriters and to worsen employment conditions a nd job satisfaction.Brokers also saw EPS as a potential threat to their employment security. There is resistance to technical change in the London Insurance Market and failure to adopt these technologies. EPS challenges the traditional mode of operation. We recommend that there be a balance between the use of computer technologies and traditional methodologies. References December, J. Katz, S. nd, What is an abstract The writing center, Online Available at http//www.rpi. edu/web/writingcenter/abstracts. html Foote, M. 2006, Some concrete ideas about manuscript abstracts, Chest, vol. 129, no. 5, p. 1375-1377. Guidelines for writing an abstract, Sigma Theta Tau, International, Online Available at http//www. umassd. edu/nursing/theta_kappa/research_committee/guidelines_abstract. doc Maughan, R. 2001, Editorial abstract thoughts, Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 305. Rooryck, Johan van Heuven, V.2003, Guidelines for writing abstracts, Leiden University, Online Available at http//www. unc. edu/linguistics/confinfo_files/hil-tips. pdf Shannon, S. 2000, paternity a structured abstract, Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, vol. 51, no. 6, p. 328-329. Staiger, D. L. 1965, What todays students need to know about writing abstracts, Journal of Business Communication, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29-33. Walsham, G. 2001, Making a world of difference IT in a global context, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 150-160.